38. Maenpaa, Elizabeth. & Jalovaara, Meters. (2013). The results out of homogamy into the socio-financial record and you may training on change of cohabitation to relationships. Acta Sociologica , 56 (3), 247-263.

39. Oprisan, Age., & Cristea, D. (2012). Several details of influence regarding the concept of marital satisfaction. Procedia – Public and you can Behavioural Sciences , , 33 , 468-472.

An effective longitudinal investigation of worry spillover in marriage: Really does spousal service adequacy boundary the consequences?

40. Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Identity parallels in the lovers. Character and you will Private Differences , 45 (6), 533-535.

I be prepared to get a hold of distinctions­ one of learnt places, while they features diffe­ book sociocultural updates, and additionally distinctions based in the individual issues that can get affect the new proportion into the matchmaking

43. Ruppanner, L., Bernhardt, Age., & Branden, Yards. (2017). Section of cleaning and his awesome along with her view of cleaning equity: A good typology out of Swedish lovers. Group Research , thirty six , 501-524.

forty-two. Russell, Roentgen. J. H., & Wells, P. (1993). Wedding while the Relashionship Survey: MARQ Manual . 자세히 보기