But not, the use of this information is not as opposed to its issue. Although current investigation focuses primarily on the ways that battle-Blackness specifically-are taken up to, there is absolutely no legitimate technique for surveying this new ethnic, racial, gender, sexuality, and other public identifications of one’s people. In the fb data out-of linguistic demonstration from null subjects within the several types of Language, Adrian Rodriguez Riccelli (2018) cards brand new downsides of using on the web vocabulary analysis by the noting you to definitely “[o]ne disadvantage to this methodology is the problem during the opening sociolinguistic and you may language background, together with biographical suggestions. Pointers posted into good user’s profile is generally wrong otherwise missing in general and that is already maybe not without difficulty extracted. However, new cousin availability and you may too much levels of studies renders for an enticing unit useful. So long as the restrictions was accepted” (p. 311). In our situation, the fresh removal from highest-size ideological constructions can still be hit, regardless if we are not able to immediately gauge the ways most other functions eg gender or sociocultural subjectivity change the pronouncements. After that, the usage talk research hinges on the words are introduced, leaving place for a diagnosis away from low-verbal communication throughout the creation of ethno-racial ideologies within these networks. Still, the usage the present day methodology allows us to flow beyond anecdotal or interview study off racial ideologies by giving the means to access large amounts of data with cousin convenience. Later, which really works would be together with electronic media degree exploring new ways topic positionality tells social media interaction to submit a build for understanding the subjective characteristics out of battle framework throughout these platforms. 자세히 보기