Brand new survey contains 3 pieces. Region We provided concerns regarding socio-group study (ages, amount of degree, parity, familial earnings, job, current relationship reputation, sexual passion, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you may reputation of unusual cervical disease evaluating).

Area II composed du kan prГёve dette of six questions about the goal women who should be screened, years first off, volume, many years or requirements to end out-of evaluating, and techniques of evaluation. Only the people who had heard out of HPV carry out proceed to help you Part III hence analyzed understanding of HPV of the variety of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), form away from indication and you can reduction.

Prior to the data, the new questionnaire of part II and region III when you look at the Thai adaptation have been considered, discussed, and you will modified up to consensus one of 20 researchers have been all gynecologic oncologists (particular was indeed people various other parallel knowledge). The pros ranked every one of 19 questions just like the sometimes ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The object-peak Stuff Legitimacy Directory (I-CVI) are determined each goods, together with Blogs Authenticity List (CVI) is determined by using the average proportion regarding fourteen questions about information about cervical disease screening and you will 5 questions about HPV. Brand new CVI were 1 for elements of the new questionnaire (S1 Desk). 자세히 보기