The partnership anywhere between outcrossing point and you can cumulative exercise wasn’t extreme (quadratic regression: F
For a few tree species in Sri Lanka’s wet https://secure.meetupstatic.com/photos/member/a/0/f/1/highres_268661201.jpeg” alt=”rencontres entre personnes de plus de 50 ans”> zone woods, fresh fruit place more than doubled that have outcrossing distance, peaking within advanced-length contained in this-tree crosses (1–10 km according to varieties). Into the crosses ranging from woods consuming independent forest supplies, not, fruits lay was somewhat reduced (otherwise almost thus) both for kinds. On the other hand, seed products germination and you may seedling height within step one year to own Sh. cordifolia advised crossbreed energy around-tree crosses. The results regarding nearby-next-door neighbor mating ranged one of trees and you can types; the newest imply fitness price of nearest-next-door neighbor mating relative to mating that have modestly more faraway locals was 45% having S. rubicundum and you may 0% having Sh. cordifolia. On the other hand, the fresh new exercise negative effects of ranging from-tree crossing were substantial both for varieties (52 and you will 70% according to contained in this-forest crosses for similar one or two kinds). Crossing effects reduced between the amount out of fresh fruit set and you can 1-yr-dated seedling dimensions; only the previous are high for both varieties. Efficiency imply a strong possibility of biparental inbreeding anxiety in this tree tree communities and limited reproductive separation one of trees consuming the rest forest reserves within the Sri Lanka’s moist area.
Inbreeding anxiety is usually quoted since an inescapable result of anthropogenic disturbance to help you warm forests (e.grams., forest fragmentation, logging), where idea forecasts you to definitely typical mating models inside currently lower-thickness tree populations are moved on in order to choose brief-distance crosses. Up until now, although not, the results away from raised close-next-door neighbor mating having society physical fitness into the warm trees provides but really to help you getting quantified empirically. One or two fundamental concerns is addressed is: Would grownups avoid maturing seed products based on close-neighbor crosses and you can, if not, just how fit try close-neighbor-derived progeny in accordance with anyone else? This study analyzes the effects out of near-neighbor mating in 2 exotic tree species yourself thanks to physical fitness contrasting away from crosses ranging from nearby locals which have crosses related to a whole lot more faraway mates.
Shorea cordifolia (Dipterocarpaceae) are a locally numerous main cover varieties one flowers heavily from the abnormal supra-annual times (I. A. U. Letter. Gunatilleke et al., unpublished research). Plant life on the varieties is actually light and you can quick-resided, in addition to winged fruit was distribute because of the snap otherwise the law of gravity. Because of its very restricted seeds dispersal, genetic relatedness among close neighbors in sheer tree is expected so you’re able to be high. Inside signed forest from the Sinharaja, Sh. cordifolia usually occurs in clumps from ?5–20 adults, intermixed which have shorter stems (private observance).
Analysis investigation
For both species, within-treatment variation among maternal trees in fruit set was substantial for all outcrosses involving pollen donors within Sinharaja Reserve. In contrast, variation in fruit set rate was very low for between-forest crosses (Fig. 2). For Sh. cordifolia, fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment ranged from only 0.5 to 0.6% and was significantly lower than the mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 2.71%, F1,58 = 9.94, P < 0.0003). For S. rubicundum, mean fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment (2.67%) was low relative to mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 5.97%). The difference was nearly significant (Fstep 1,58 = 3.78, P < 0.06).
For Sh. cordifolia, cumulative fitness was maximum at both the distant neighbor and distant within-forest treatments (Fig. 5). Peak cumulative fitness observed for these intermediate crossing treatments was 2 and 4.3 times the cumulative fitnesses of the nearest-neighbor and distant between-forest treatments, respectively, although these differences were not significant (Table 3B). dos,8 = 3.70, P = 0.073). Mean cumulative fitness of open-pollinated flowers exceeded that of all other hand-pollination treatments, again likely due to the detrimental effect of the hand-pollination procedure on fruit set in this species. As for fruit set, mean cumulative fitness (relative) of the distant between-forest treatment (mean = 0.12) was significantly lower than that of all within-forest outcrossed classes combined (mean = 0.51, F1,12 = 8.77, P = 0.012).
Near-next-door neighbor crossing effect
Near-neighbor crossing effects have been demonstrated for a number of coniferous species (Coles and Fowler, 1976; Park and Fowler, 1982, 1984; Latta et al., 1998), but only three studies have yielded evidence of near-neighbor crossing effects in woody angiosperms (Syzygium cormiflorum-Crome and Irvine, 1986; Schiedea spp.-Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989; Eucalyptus globules-Hardner, Potts, and Gore, 1998). In another study suggestive of biparental inbreeding depression, mean fruit set rates were significantly lower for intraspecific crosses <0.5 km distance than for crosses >1 km distance for three subcanopy tree species (Inga spp.) in Costa Rica (Koptur, 1984). In fact, it may be that biparental inbreeding depression is common in natural populations of forest trees, but that estimation of its potential through experimental cross-pollinations has been limited to only a few species due to the obvious difficulty of working in the canopy. To my knowledge, there are no published reports of failed attempts to find near-neighbor crossing effects in natural populations of forest trees.
댓글을 남겨주세요
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!